Anthropic explains how the watermark in Claude's text works

Anthropic published an official explanation of the mechanism that writes a watermark into text Claude generates. With the new European labeling rules, the subject stops being a technical curiosity and enters compliance territory, because it offers a way to establish the origin of content even when whoever publishes it does not say so.

On August 14, Anthropic published answers to questions about how the watermark in text Claude generates works. The mechanism derives from SynthID-Text, which comes out of Google DeepMind. The timing is not accidental, since European regulation has required transparency since August 2. How it works No hidden characters are inserted into the text, and the response is not altered afterward. What changes instead is the source of randomness the model uses for part of its word choice. Those choices are individually meaningless, but a long text contains many of them, and together they leave a pattern. A reader does not notice it, and anyone holding the key that pattern was written with can recognize it. Why now Labeling that depends only on the goodwill of the publisher falls away the moment someone moves the text into another system. A watermark written into the text itself tries to make origin travel with the content. Anthropic thereby joins OpenAI and Google in explaining how it intends to meet the European requirements. According to the support page, new Claude models released in the Union since August 2 support labeling from the start. What this does not solve The watermark survives copying but not rewriting. If a person or another model substantially reshapes the content, the pattern is lost. This is a means of establishing origin, then, not proof that something was not made with AI.