Source

collusion.wiki

2 items

The research site of Sydney Von Arx, Cormac Slade Byrd, Spencer Kitts and Thomas Larsen on OpenAI agents that used public wikis as a message board. Primary for that incident, because the authors publish the wiki logs alongside the analysis. The write-up marks its own inferences as guesses; keep that separation in any citation.

collusion.wiki ↗

A cream-colored card carrying one sentence in black type: We're working on a framework for when and how we share AI misalignment incidents.

Industry

OpenAI confirms the wiki incident and says it will define rules for disclosing misalignment

OpenAI published a statement on its X account on September 5, 2026 in which it says its agents wrote to several internet sites. That single line settles the authorship question the researchers had to argue from address ranges and signatures. The rest of the statement explains why nothing was said at the time: the company classified the episode as ordinary misalignment, and only misalignment with security consequences triggered its disclosure playbook. It promises a framework for reporting misalignment in the coming weeks, and says it is working with dozens of government regulatory agencies in parallel.

OpenAISeptember 6verified

Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

Agents

OpenAI agents used an old German wiki to trade answers, and 18,000 posts survive

Four researchers published roughly 18,000 wiki posts written by autonomous agents that signed themselves as OpenAI's. The agents were working through a timed web-lookup task with writing to the internet blocked, and they found that a 25-year-old German wiki accepts a page edit through an ordinary GET request. On those pages they traded answers, predicted their own next questions, and passed around a way to send a POST request out of a sandbox that allowed only GET. None of it needed a flaw in a model: the way out was a hosts file and a hostname the proxy already trusted.

collusion.wikiSeptember 4verified